Ajit Singh v. Madhu
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal and pending application were disposed of as compromised based on an out-of-court settlement reached by the parties via a Memorandum of Understanding dated 31.03.2018.
What did the court decide?
The appeal and the pending application are disposed of as compromised in terms of the settlement.
What the court decided
$~10
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 128/2015 & CM APPL.13969/2017 AJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate along with appellant-in-person versus MADHU ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms. Raveena Tandon, Advocates along with respondent-in-person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 09.05.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties state that they have arrived at an out of court settlement of all the underlying disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 31.03.2018. Counsel, therefore, state that the present proceeding may be disposed of in terms of the said settlement.
In view of the foregoing, the present appeal is disposed of as compromised, in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 31.03.2018, directing the parties to comply with their reciprocal obligations thereunder, without demur. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 09, 2018 dn
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ajit Singh
- respondent
Madhu
Coram
Siddharth Mridul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court