The decision in related appeal FAO (OS) (Comm) 86/2017 is referenced. Appeals heard and disposed of with no substantive reasoning or legal proposition provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 09.03.2018 Pronounced on: 11.04.2018
+ FAO (OS) (COMM) 76/2017, CAV. 328/2017, C.M. APPL.1334813352/2017
MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. …..Appellants
Through: Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba. M. Singh, Sh. C.M. Lall, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Sh. Kapil Midha, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshika Malhotra, Sh. Adarsh Ramanujam, Sh. Anil Dutt, Sh. Shantanu Agarwal, Sh. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Anusuya Nigam, Sh. Lakshay Kaushik and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates.
NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. AND ORS. …Respondents
Through: Sh. C.A. Sundaram, Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Swati Setia, Sh. Essence Obhan, Ms. Himanie Katoch, Sh. Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Ms. Pooja Katara, Ms. Charul Yadav, Sh. Abhishek Saket, Ms. Vijaya Singh, Sh. Jatin and Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
%
Monsanto’s appeal [FAO (OS)(Comm) 76/2017] is dismissed and Nuziveedu’s appeal [FAO (OS)(Comm) 86/2017] is partly allowed; its counter claim is allowed to a limited extent, with no order on costs.
FAO (OS) (COMM) 76/2017
Page 1 of 2
For detailed judgment, the decision dated 11.04.2018 in FAO(OS)(Comm) 86/2017 may be referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE)
YOGESH KHANNA (JUDGE)
APRIL 11, 2018
FAO (OS) (COMM) 76/2017
Page 2 of 2
Monsanto Technology LLC and Ors.
Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. and Ors.
S Ravindra Bhat
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
