Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings. The court granted leave and liberty, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and disposed of pending applications.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
MEENU BANSAL
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Amandeep and Mr. Nachiketa Suri, Advocates
versus
ALLAHABAD BANK AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ashok Kr. Jain and Mr. Amit Kasera, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 10.04.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
VINOD GOEL, J
APRIL 10, 2018/ as
Meenu Bansal
Allahabad Bank and Ors.
Siddharth Mridul
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
