M/S. Darshan Foods v. Satpal
Case brief
What is this about?
Suitor for permanent injunction in trademark infringement case. Parties settled by defendant stopping mark use and paying Rs.25,000 damages. Suit decreed accordingly pending applications disposed.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed per paragraph 38(A) of plaint; defendant to pay Rs.25,000 within two weeks.
What the court decided
14 $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 781/2017 & I.A. 13285/2017
M/S. DARSHAN FOODS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate.
versus
SATPAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 16.02.2018
Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, damages and rendition of accounts etc.
On 19th January, 2018, learned counsel for defendant had stated that the defendant has stopped using the impugned trade mark.
Consequently, the Joint Registrar listed the matter before this Court.
Today, learned counsel for defendant states that defendant has no objection if the present suit is decreed in accordance with paragraph 38(A) of the plaint.
Coram
MANMOHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court