The court disposed of the civil suit following a settlement agreement dated 22.11.2017. A decree was passed in terms of the agreement where plaintiffs received Rs. 1 lakh. Consequently, 50% court fee refund was granted.
Suit disposed with decree in terms of settlement; decree passed; 50% court fee refund granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DR PRITESH SINGH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate.
versus
COLLEGE BOOK STORE & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jai Pratap, Advocate for defendant No.1. Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate for defendant Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 19.02.2018
signed by the parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Plaintiffs have received a sum of Rs.1 lakh by means of a cheque bearing no.236088 dated 19.2.2018 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, M Block, Connaught Place, New Delhi toward litigation costs as stated in the settlement agreement dated 22.11.2017.
settlement agreement dated 22.11.2017, disputes between the parties stand satisfied on the plaintiffs having received a sum of Rs.1 lakh and which is subject to realization. Suit is accordingly disposed of as disputes between the parties stand satisfied.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2018 Ne
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit should be disposed of based on the executed settlement agreement.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fee under Section 16-A of the Court-fees Act.
Whether the disputes between the parties are satisfied upon payment of settlement amounts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
