The execution petition was disposed of as satisfied. The court observed that while decree holders had not accepted all terms of the bank's rent offer, the judgment debtor had paid admitted rent for an admitted area, rendering no further order necessary.
Present execution petition stands disposed of as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ 16
HARVINDER SINGH BHASIN & ORS ..... Decree Holders
Through Mr.Sushil Kumar Singh with Mr.Ashish Kumar and Ms.Surabhi Diwan, Advocates.
versus
JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK ..... Judgement Debtor Through Ms.Kanika Agnihotri with Mr.Karan Minocha, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
% 19.02.2018
After some arguments, it transpires that though the decree holders for the purposes of present execution petition have taken rent at the rate of Rs.290/- per sq. feet in accordance with the letter dated 03rd August, 2016 issued by the judgment debtor/bank, yet the decree holders have not accepted the other terms of the said letter, in particular, the extent of the area that had been let out.
Since the judgment debtor/bank has paid the admitted liability towards rent at the rate of Rs.203/- per sq. feet for the admitted area of 3792.71 sq. feet, this Court is of the view that no further orders are called for in the present execution petition. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as satisfied.
MANMOHAN, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2018/KA
HARVINDER SINGH BHASIN & ORS
JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
