Defendant agreed to stop using trademark ZOHAR and withdraw application No.3703193. Court disposed of the present suit and pending applications accordingly.
Present suit and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~OS-17
..... Plaintiff Through Mr.K.K.Sharma, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Gagandeep Chawla, Mr.Swarn Raja and Mr.Akshay Srivastava, Advs.
AMIT JAIN & ORS
versus
KULJEET SINGH WADHWA & ANR ..... Defendant Through Mr.Ayush Negi and Mr.Himanshu Tyagi, Advs. with D-1 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
% 16.02.2018
Learned counsel appearing for the defendant on instructions from Mr.Kuljeet Singh Wadhwa/defendant No.1, who is present in court in person, states that the defendant is not using the impugned trademark ZOHAR and shall not in future use the trademark ZOHAR. The defendant shall also withdraw their application No.3703193. He further confirms that the defendant is only using the trademark ZOHARA.
Taking the above submissions of the defendant on record and binding the defendant to the said statement, present suit is disposed of.
All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2018
n
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
