The High Court of Delhi, on its own motion, dismissed a bail revision petition against an accused who had failed to secure a conviction due to insufficient evidence by the prosecution. The personal bond furnished by the respondent was discharged.
The petition stands disposed of; the personal bond furnished by the respondent stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3.
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govind Puri
versus
JAI PAL SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.Badrinath, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R
%
24.07.2018
We have heard Mr. Katyal, learned APP as well as Mr. B. Badrinath, the counsel representing the respondent at some length.
We are not inclined to proceed further with this petition since, in our view the prosecution was not able to muster enough evidence to secure the conviction of the accused.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
The personal bond furnished by the respondent stands discharged.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 24, 2018 N.Khanna
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court proceeding on its own motion should proceed with the bail revision petition given the insufficient evidence.
Whether the personal bond furnished by the accused should be discharged.
JAI PAL SINGH
THE STATE
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
