The petitioner's counsel stated on instructions that the petition was filed for his son taken into custody and requested withdrawal. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, St. Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate with Insp. Manoj Sharma (SHO), SI Anuj Kumar, PS-Mayur Vihar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 23.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner’s son has been taken into custody in respect of a case registered against him. He therefore wishes to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 23, 2018 nk
BUNDU QURESHI
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S.MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
