Disposed
Vinod Kumar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1462/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5.
VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 24.07.2018
Further status report has been tendered in Court and is taken on record. It appears that several steps have been taken by the police to locate the petitioner’s missing wife– Meera Devi. It also appears that she had earlier as well gone with the suspect Raj Kumar on 15.02.2018. She was located near Surat and brought back. She again went missing on 26.04.2018 and the suspect is also not available. The status report shows that several mobile numbers have been tracked and CDR obtained and the same are being analysed. Let the copies of the same be provided to the petitioner as well.
The search for Meera Devi shall continue and whatever information is derived by the police shall be shared with the petitioner. In case the petitioner provides any leads, the same shall be looked into with all
seriousness and followed up. The police shall file the status report every month before the concerned Court having jurisdiction over the case.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 24, 2018 N.Khanna
VINOD KUMAR
STATE & ANR.
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S.MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court