In a revision petition against conviction and sentence under Section 138 NI Act, the Court modified the sentence to time already undergone, set aside the fine payable to the State, and ordered release due to settlement and financial hardship.
Sentence reduced to period undergone; fine of Rs. 20,000 to State set aside; petitioner released forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
VINOD KHANNA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Vikas Gupta, Mr Vipin Kalra and Mr Savel Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr Akshai Malik, APP. Mr Ajai Kumar, Advocate with Mr Manoj Kumar, Proprietor of R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 15.01.2018 Crl. M.A. 21074/2017(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.REV.P. 42/2018
Crl.Rev.P.42/2018
Page 1
two months.
Crl.Rev.P.42/2018
Page 2
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 15, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.Rev.P.42/2018
Page 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to modify the sentence and fine imposed on the petitioner guilty of cheque dishonour in view of settlement and hardship.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod Khanna
State
Respondent No.2
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
