Criminal Misc. Civil No. 157/2018 was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court clarified that the dismissal did not preclude the petitioners from relying on the impugned MOU dated 06.09.2016 at an appropriate stage, if legally permissible. No substantive ruling on the MOU's validity was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
SUNIL KUMAR & ORS
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raj Kamal, Mr. Karan Khanuja, Mr. Tushar Agarwal and Mr. Pragalbh Bhardwaj, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State with SI Parmod Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 12.01.2018
Crl. M.A. No. 648/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 157/2018
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 157/2018
CRL.M.C. 157/2018
Page 1
considered at an appropriate state, he would not press this petition any further and would like to withdraw the same.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 12, 2018 ‘ rs’
CRL.M.C. 157/2018
Page 2
Sunil Kumar
State of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
