The High Court of Delhi quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC. The court observed that the matrimonial dispute was settled, a mutual consent divorce decree had been obtained, and the respondent did not wish to pursue the complaint further.
FIR No. 180/2009 and consequent proceedings are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
GAURAV SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr Sunny Mansingh, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
..... Respondents
Through : Mr Arun Kumar Sharma, APP. Mr Gaurav Gitkara and Mr Ankit Sethi, Advocates for R-2. SI Ranbir Singh, PS Nangloi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R % 15.01.2018 Crl. M.A. 738/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 178/2018
Crl.M.C.178/2018
Page 1
been obtained and the final decree of divorce having been passed on 01.08.2017.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 15, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.M.C.178/2018
Page 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR under Section 498-A IPC should be quashed when parties have settled their disputes and divorce has been obtained by mutual consent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gaurav Sharma
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No.2
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
