The Court dismissed an application for condonation of a 1392-day delay in filing a revision petition challenging a maintenance order of Rs. 1500 per month awarded to the petitioner's two children. No grounds sufficient for condonation were found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
ANIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Sanjay Dubey and Mr Narender Singh, Advocates.
versus KAVITA DEVI ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 09.02.2018 Crl.M.A.2580/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.REV.P. 117/2018 & Crl.M.A.2581/2018(stay), 2582/2018(calling TCR), 2583/2018(direction)
Crl.M.A.2584/2018(delay in filing the petition for 1392 days)
Crl.Rev.P.117/2018
Page 1
CRL.REV.P. 117/2018
Since the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Revision Petition has been dismissed, the Revision Petition is also dismissed.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.Rev.P.117/2018
Page 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing a revision petition impugning a maintenance award is meritorious.
Whether an explanation of legal advice suffices to justify an inordinate delay of 1392 days.
ANIL KUMAR
KAVITA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
