The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC. The parties had settled via mediation, obtained a divorce by mutual consent, and the respondent stated she no longer wished to prosecute.
FIR No.55/07 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and consequent proceedings were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rupendra Pratap Singh, Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates for respondent No.2 with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 09.02.2018
CRL.M.C. 691/2018
Page 1
08.02.2018 for Rs.4,80,000/- drawn on Allahabad Bank, (ii) Banker’s Cheque No.022117 dated 29.01.2018 for Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on Kangra Co-operative Bank Ltd. and (iii) Demand Draft No.503218 dated 30.01.2018 for Rs.5,00,000/- drawn on ICICI Bank.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2018 st
CRL.M.C. 691/2018
Page 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed given the settlement, divorce by mutual consent, and lack of further prosecution desire by the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajit Chawla & Ors
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
