Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR involving matrimonial discord. The court noted the dispute was settled, marriage dissolved by mutual consent, and the complainant did not wish to press charges. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings.
Quashed FIR No.173/2012 and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
SHRI RAJAT JEET SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr Praveen Suri, Advocate with petitioner Nos.1 to 4.
versus
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Respondent No.2 in person. SI Dhananjay Kumar, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr Mukesh Kumar, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 08.02.2018 Crl. M.A. 2422/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 675/2018
CRL.M.C.675/2018
Page 1
CRL.M.C.675/2018
Page 2
consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2018 ‘Sn’
CRL.M.C.675/2018
Page 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and consequent proceedings should be quashed given the settlement and dissolution of marriage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Rajat Jeet Singh & Ors
The State & Anr
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
