This court quashed an FIR registered under Section 363 IPC after ascertaining that the dispute between matrimonial parties was amicably settled with free consent.
FIR No.98/2014 under Section 363 IPC and all proceedings therefrom are quashed and the petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
PROMOD KUMAR YADAV & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.Rameet Singh, Advocate along with petitioners in person.
versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel.
Mr.Sunil Satyarthi, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. SI Sushil, PS Rajinder Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R
% 05.04.2018
CRL.M.A.No. 5953/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 962/2018
Page 1 of 2
parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and petitioners No. 1 and 2 are living together. Complainant has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.
S.P.GARG, J
APRIL 05, 2018 / tr
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No.98/2014 registered under Section 363 IPC can be quashed on the ground of amicable settlement between matrimonial parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PROMOD KUMAR YADAV
STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
