Rameshwari v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition seeking furlough for the petitioner on the grounds that she wished to partition family property. The Court held the application premature as the petitioner had recently availed furlough.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as premature without considering substantive grounds.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 828/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.5192/2018 RAMESHWARI
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advs. along with SI Anu.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 20.03.2018
The petitioner is seeking furlough for the reasons mentioned in the petition. One such reason is that she wants to partition her property amongst her four children.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for furlough is maintainable when the petitioner recently availed similar liberty that expired only weeks ago.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rameshwari
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court