Petitioner filed an application to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file it at an appropriate stage. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
SANJIV KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through : Ms.Kaadambari with Ms.Abha Sinha, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Siddarth Sindhu, Proxy counsel for Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC. SI Manish Yadav, PS Vasant Kunj North.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
% 04.04.2018
APRIL 04, 2018 / tr
S.P.GARG, J
Sanjiv Kumar
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
S.P. GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
