Allowed
Satpal Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/454/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SATPAL JAIN ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Puneet Garg and Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with SI Suresh Kumar, PS Barakhamba Road.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl.M.A. No. 2710/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 454/2018
As per the nominal roll the petitioner is undergoing sentence in default of payment of fine which cannot be suspended.
Petition is dismissed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
APRIL 05, 2018 ‘yo’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal M.A. No. 2710/2018 (Exemption) deserves allowance.
SATPAL JAIN
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court