Suraj Kumr Rana v. the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's wife was produced and stated she does not wish to return to her and lacks funds for the minor children. No further order could be passed.
The petitioner's wife was produced and stated she does not wish to return to her and lacks funds for the minor children. No further order could be passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
%
O R D E R 11.04.2018
The wife of the petitioner has been produced. She is present in Court with her mother.
We have interacted with the wife of the petitioner in Court. She states that she does not wish to return to reside with the petitioner. She further states that she does not have the financial capability for bringing up the two minor children.
In view of the aforesaid, no further orders can be passed in this petition. The same stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
P.S.TEJI, J
APRIL 11, 2018/ PB
SURAJ KUMR RANA
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
VIPIN SANGHI
P.S. TEJI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court