This order quashes an FIR registered under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties after dissolution of marriage, with the respondent receiving the remaining compensation amount in court.
FIR No.635/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings therefrom are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
VINEET PARCHA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr.Amit Vohra, Advocate along with petitioners present in person.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Jamal Akhtar, counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing counsel. Mr.Nitish Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the complainant along with complainant/R-2 present in person. SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Amar Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R % 09.03.2018
Crl.M.A.No.4503/2018 (Exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 734/2018
Page 1 of 2
S.P.GARG, J.
MARCH 09, 2018/ sa
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 734/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC should be quashed after amicable settlement.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
VINEET PARCHA & ORS.
STATE
COMPLAINANT
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
