Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
..... Petitioner Through: Mr Dinesh Kumar Verma
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Ms Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Surendra Ahlawat Mr Nitin Khanna, Adv for R-5&6 Mr Atul Nigam, Adv for R-7,8,9,11 & 12
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 13.03.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Permission granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
MARCH 13, 2018 SU
MANOJ SALUJA
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
