This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent Through Ms. Purnima Pratik for Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State along with SI Sonu.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
% 13.02.2018
The petitioner has been granted parole by the Competent Authority vide order dated 27.12.2017. This was subject to the verification of the address of the petitioner from the SSP, Bulandshar. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that this verification has till date not been carried out.
Notice of this petition has been accepted by the learned counsel for the State. She points out that the verification in terms of the directions contained in the order dated 27.12.2017 has been conducted and the address of the petitioner stands verified. The order dated 27.12.2017 be implemented forthwith.
At this stage, the petition is not pressed any further.
Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 A
TRILOKI
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
