Mehboob v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants the petitioner, a convict under IPC Sections 395/120B, parole for four weeks to file a Special Leave Petition. The court admitted him on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety, requiring surrender upon expiry and reporting to the local SHO.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted on parole for four weeks on personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety to file an SLP.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 3240/2017 MEHBOOB
| ..... Petitioner | ||
|---|---|---|
| Through | Mr.Neraj Bhardwaj | for Mr. Dinesh |
| Malik, Adv. | ||
| versus |
STATE
| ..... Respondent | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Through | Mr.Jam | al Akhtar |
for Mr.Rahul |
| Mehra, State. |
Standing | Counsel for the |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 13.02.2018
The permanent address of the petitioner is found to be correct. The nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that the petitioner is a convict under Sections 395/120B of the IPC. The maximum sentence which had been awarded to him is RI for 7 years; all the sentences are to run concurrently. On 18.12.2017 the petitioner has undergone incarceration of about 6 years meaning thereby that as on date he has undergone incarceration of about 6 years and 3 months. His jail conduct is satisfactory. The reason for seeking parole is to file an SLP against the dismissal of his appeal by this Court on 01.6.2017. The prayer made in the petition is granted.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit the petitioner a parole to file an SLP against a dismissal of his appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MEHBOOB MALIK
- respondent
STATE
Coram
INDERMEET KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court