Sunil Nishcal v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite the matter being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
..... Petitioner
Through None.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.
..... Respondents Through Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC with Mr.Prem Sagar Pal , Mr.Bhagat Singh and Ms.Suman Shavan, Advocates with SI Vinay Sangan from P.S.Khyala.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 13.02.2018
Learned counsel for the State points out that in terms of the prayer made in the present petition, a show cause notice for censure was issued to respondent no.3 upon which appropriate order has been passed on 06.12.2017. The status report filed by the respondents is taken on record.
Since none has appeared for the petitioner despite the matter having been called twice, this petition is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2018 ndn
Sunil Nishcal
Commissioner of Police
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court