Petitioners sought protection due to marrying of their own free will. Respondent No. 2 stated no interference would occur as marriage was consensual. With no apprehension or complaint, petition dismissed with no further orders.
No further orders passed; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42# $~
| + W.P.(CRL) 402/2018 |
|
|---|---|
| LAXMI RANI & ANR Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioners Ms. Jyoti Gupta, Advocate with petitioners in person. |
| STATE & ANR Represented by: |
..... Respondents Mr. Ashish Negi, Advocate for Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Mayur Vihar. |
| Mr. Vikram Hegde, Advocate for respondent No. 2 with respondent No.2 in person. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 19.04.2018
W.P.(CRL) 402/2018 Page 1 of 2
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
APRIL 19, 2018 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 402/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition seeking protection from coercion regarding a major's marriage of her own free will warrants further orders when no threat or complaint is lodged.
Laxmi Rani & Anr
State & Anr
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
