alleged first meeting. The complainant further alleged that the petitioner came to Delhi on 19th October, 2016 which fact has not been verified and till date the flight documents of the petitioner have not been seized by the Investigating Officer as the same would belie the version of the prosecutrix. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that though the case of the prosecutrix is that the petitioner took photographs on his phone however, the petitioner was in possession of only a number phone and not a multimedia phone with various features. This is the reason that the phone of the petitioner has not been seized till date by the investigating officer. 4. Allegations of the prosecutrix in the above noted FIR based on the written complaint given by her at PS Bhajan Pura on 21st September, 2017 are that in October, 2012 she went for a family matter to High Court of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Bench where she met the petitioner who started chatting with her. While they were talking, the petitioner took her mobile phone and called his number, thereby retrieving the number of the complainant. Thereafter the petitioner started following her and made number of calls. It is further alleged that in the year 2013 the petitioner came to Delhi and raped the complainant when she was not medically fit. The last incident alleged in the FIR is of October, 2016.
