In a writ petition regarding the return of an original Will, the petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the petition after receiving the document. The High Court of Delhi granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39# $~
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with SI Kuldeep Singh, PS Model Town.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 19.04.2018
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions submits that the original Will dated 14th February, 1999 executed by late father of the petitioner which was inquired into on the complaint filed by Smt. Pinki Srivastav was seized from the petitioner. Since no cognizable offence was found out no FIR was registered and thus the original Will dated 14th February, 1999 has been handed over to the petitioner after keeping a photocopy of the same on record.
In view of the fact that the petitioner has received the original Will dated 14th February, 1999, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
APRIL 19, 2018/‘vn’
NARESH SRIVASTAVA
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
