The Court produced the wife of the petitioner, Ms. Pooja Thapar. She expressed a desire to reside with her parents. The writ petition and pending applications were dismissed as not pressed.
The writ petition and pending applications were dismissed as not pressed. No further directions were issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
SHRI SANJAY SOLANKI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Devesh Prakash Gautam, Advocate along with petitioner. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) along with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate. for State. Inspector Rajni Chopra with SI Vikas Mudgal, P.S. Khyala. Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for Complainant. Respondent No. 6 in person along with daughter.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 10.12.2018
The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, seeks a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, directing the official respondents to produce Ms. Pooja Thapar, the wife of the petitioner.
page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 3741/2018
The Delhi Police has produced Ms. Pooja Thapar, before the Court today.
We have interacted with Ms. Pooja Thapar, Mr. Sanjay Solanki, as well, Mr. Om Parkash Thapar, in Chambers.
In view of the circumstance that, Ms. Pooja Thapar, has appeared before this Court and expressed her desire to reside with her parents, at this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press this petitioner any further.
The petition, as well as, the pending applications are dismissed as not pressed and disposed of accordingly. No further directions are called for.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
DECEMBER 10, 2018 RS
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 3741/2018
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shri Sanjay Solanki
State & Ors.
Siddharth Mridul
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
