This order dismisses a habeas corpus petition where the petitioner ceased to press the claim to produce his wife, as she had voluntarily appeared before the Court expressing a desire to reside with her parents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R
% 10.12.2018
The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1949, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, seeking a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, directing the respondents to produce Ms. Saloni @ Farah Naaz, the wife of the petitioner.
The Delhi Police has produced Ms. Saloni @ Farah Naaz, before this Court today.
W.P.(CRL) 3706/2018
page 1 of 2
We have interacted with Ms. Saloni @ Farah Naaz, Mr. Pramod Kumar, as well, Mr. Mohd. Naushad, in Chambers.
In view of the circumstance that, Ms. Saloni @ Farah Naaz, has appeared before this Court and expressed her desire to reside with her parents, at this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press this petitioner any further.
The petition, as well as, the pending application, are dismissed as not pressed and disposed of accordingly. No further directions are called for.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
DECEMBER 10, 2018 RS
W.P.(CRL) 3706/2018
page 2 of 2
Pramod Kumar
State & Ors.
Siddharth Mridul
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
