The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition seeking parole. The court held that the petitioner had already availed two furloughs following a recent four-week parole, finding no ground to grant another release.
Petition dismissed; parole application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
VINAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Prem Prakash and Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocates
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC for the State with Ms.Suman Saharan, Advocate and ASI Subhash
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
availed two furloughs for a period of two weeks and three weeks respectively with effect from 18th July, 2018 and 6th November, 2018. 4. In view of the fact that the petitioner has already availed two furloughs, this Court finds no ground to grant parole to the petitioner.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
DECEMBER 07, 2018 mamta
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 1142/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole should be granted to the petitioner given his history of availing furloughs shortly after a recent parole.
Vinay Kumar
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
