The petitioner, having not expected foul play and pressing their plea, satisfied the Court that the security order was complied with and counsel appointed for the day requested no further intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 06.12.2018
Ms. Kamna Vohra, the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that this Court’s order dated 07.09.2018 has been duly complied with and present address of the petitioners has been handed over to the I.O. through her. The petitioners have been provided with due protection and nothing adverse has been reported apropos their security. The petitioners’ counsel is not present today. Accordingly, Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate, present in the Court today, is appointed as their counsel for the day. He states upon instructions, that the petitioners do not expect any foul play and threat to their lives and liberty at the moment. In the circumstances, he does not press the present petition at this stage.
The petition is disposed off in terms of the aforesaid order.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
DECEMBER 06, 2018/acm
SMT SALONI TYAGI & ANR
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
