The petitioner was absent on the hearing date. The court dismissed the writ petition in default due to the petitioner's non-prosecution, noting he had filed the charge-sheet in the trial court.
Petition dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
..... Petitioner
versus
STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
..... Respondents Through Ms. Richa Kapur, ASC for the State along with ASI Kailash.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 12.02.2018
The petitioner is not present. He was not present on the last date also. Learned counsel for the State points out that the charge-sheet has since been filed against the petitioner and the petitioner has been appearing in the Trial Court. The petitioner appears to be not interested in prosecuting this litigation.
Dismissed in default as also non-prosecution.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 A
Deepak Kardil
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
