The High Court of Delhi held that the present petition was infructuous since the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was filed in the competent Court, hence disposed of.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
VISHWANATH MAHENDRA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Anurag Jain and Mr. Manoj Kapoor, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Jainender Kumar, PS Anand Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 09.02.2018
Petition has become infructuous as it has been informed to this court that the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has now been filed in the competent Court.
Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2018 SU
Vishwanath Mahendra
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
