Disposed
Mukesh Tanti v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/936/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with SI Manoj Kumar, PS-Shalimar Bagh.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 19.07.2018
Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate appeared on behalf of Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) states that even after deploying the Face Recognition Software, the petitioner’s missing son has not been located. In view of the steps already taken, we are not inclined to keep the matter pending any further before us. However, we direct the IO concerned to continue with the search of the missing son of the petitioner. Further status reports be filed before the concerned Court where the FIR was registered.
In case, the petitioner provides any leads, the same shall be pursued and the petitioner shall be kept informed with the further progress in investigation from time to time.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 19, 2018 nd
MUKESH TANTI
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S.MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court