The Court disposed of a contempt petition on its own motion. It noted a settlement expressed at a Bar-Bench meeting and appreciated the Bar Council of Delhi's proposal to formulate rules to govern lawyer conduct within three months.
No relief granted; petition disposed of as no further orders were called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind K.Nigam, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Mikhil Sharma & Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu, Advocates
versus
PRATYAKSH GUPTA, ADVOCATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.C.Mittal, Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Mr. N.C.Gupta & Mr. Neeraj, Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Mr. Kirti Uppal & Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocates, Advocates for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain & Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocates for State Mr. Ghanshyam Nagar &Mr. Imran Khan, Advocates
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
%
O R D E R 20.08.2018
observed inter-alia that “having expressed remorse, the meeting held today is settled amicably between the Bar and the Bench.”
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
AUGUST 20, 2018 mw
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION
PRATYAKSH GUPTA
S.MURALIDHAR
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
