Petitioner applied to withdraw writ petition regarding detention as detainee was released by Advisory Board; court dismissed petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sarthak Sachdev and Mr. Ashish Batra, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kritiman Singh and Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Dhruv Pandey, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R
%
06.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition since the detenue stands released by the Advisory Board.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 06, 2018 sr
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DINESH B N @ DINESH GOWDA
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
