Dismissed
Vijay Kumar v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./15/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a bail appeal filed by Vijay Kumar after an SHO report stated he sold his property and left without an address. Bail bonds were cancelled.
What did the court decide?
Bail bonds and surety bonds cancelled. Appellant to be taken into custody by the SHO.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-50
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A.15/2003
¶4
VIJAY KUMAR .....Appellant Through:
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
¶9
O R D E R
¶10
% 06.04.2018
¶11
- A report has been submitted by the Station House Officer (‘SHO’) concerned that the Appellant has sold away his property and has left without leaving any forwarding address.
¶12
- In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed. The bail bonds and surety bonds furnished by the Appellant stands cancelled. The SHO will take necessary steps to take him into the custody.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether to dismiss the bail appeal after the appellant sold property and left without address.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
VIJAY KUMAR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
S. MURALIDHAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court