The High Court of Delhi disposed of a criminal miscellaneous application, allowing it subject to exceptions, and dismissed a writ petition (withdrawn) with liberty to file a revision petition before the Additional Sessions Judge.
Crl.M.A. allowed subject to exceptions; W.P. dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21# $~
ANKUR ARORA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate.
versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Ajay Kumar, PS S.J. Enclave.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 11.05.2018
Crl.M.A. No.8895/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 1460/2018
At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 11, 2018 ‘vn’
ANKUR ARORA
THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR.
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
