Disposed
Sucheta Chauhan v. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/468/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24# $~
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Prem Raj, PS Maurice Nagar and SI Devender Kumar, PS Sarai Rohilla.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 10.05.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition as according to his instructions the petitioner is no more staying in Delhi.
Leave granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 10, 2018 ‘vn’
SUCHETA CHAUHAN
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court