Dismissed
Sanjay Maharana v. State (Govt of Nct, Delhi) & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/706/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14# $~
versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT, DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Inspector Satish, CAW Cell. Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advocate for respondent No.4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 10.05.2018
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that after investigation charge sheet has been filed in case FIR No.47/2015 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC investigated by CAW Cell, Nanak Pura, Delhi.
In view of the charge sheet having been filed, learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition and application with liberty to agitate the pleas and take remedies in accordance with law.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 10, 2018 ‘vn’
Sanjay Maharana
State (Govt of NCT, Delhi)
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court