The court granted the petitioner permission to travel to Saudi Arabia for Umrah despite his passport being held. The court directed the Investigating Officer to release the passport immediately. Bail conditions were modified.
Passport released to petitioner; bail conditions modified to deposit passport with Trial Court post-return.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1# $~
| * | IN THE HIGH | COURT OF DE | LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| + | W.P.(CRL) 1456/ | 2018 | |
| AKHLAQ AHME | D KHAN Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Habibur Rahman, Advocate with petitioner in person. |
|
| STATE & ANR | Represented by: | ..... Respondents Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel for State, Ms.Suman Saharan and Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocates with SI Mukesh, PS Sagarpur |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 17.05.2018
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 1456/2018
directed that after return from Saudi Arabia, the petitioner will deposit his passport with the learned Trial Court and as and when he has to leave the country, he will seek a prior permission of the learned Trial Court. The other conditions imposed in the order dated 21st March, 2014 would remain same.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 17, 2018 ‘vn’
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 1456/2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant permission for passport release allowing travel abroad for Umrah despite pending investigation.
Whether to modify bail conditions regarding passport custody after the charge sheet is filed.
What direction to issue for future travel permissions after the petitioner returns from Saudi Arabia.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Akhlaq Ahmed Khan
State & Anr
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
