A writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR based on a settlement between parties was dismissed as the petitioners withdrew it after being granted leave to do so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25# $~
RAKESH LOHIA@ KATARIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Nitin Rai Sharma and Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 14.09.2018
Receipt of cost has been handed over which is taken on record.
By this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 71/2018 under Sections 336/427/506/34 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act registered at PS Fatehpur Beri on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that parties have settled the matter.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
Leave granted.
Petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018 ‘vn’
RAKESH LOHIA@ KATARIA & ORS
THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
