A writ petition seeking directions against police officials not to involve the petitioner in false cases was dismissed as the petitioner was already in judicial custody, rendering such directions unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
Represented by: Mr. Amit Rao, Advocate.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Siddharth Sindhu with SI Nakul, PS Bhalaswa Dairy.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 17.09.2018
there was scuffle between them and the petitioner fired, however, the complainant managed to escape by bending down.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 ‘yo’
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 342/2018
Deepak @ Deepu @ Ajay
The Commissioner of Police
Deputy Commissioner of Police, North West District
SHO PS Bhalaswa Dairy
Head Constable, Vijay Rathi
Earlier SHO posted at PS Bhalaswa Dairy
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
