In this writ petition regarding the custody of a girl child, the Court noted she wanted to stay with guardians and work. The petition was disposed of without further directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
MANGLEY @ KANCHA TAMANG ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate with Petitioner in person
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, APP for State with SI Karamveer, AHTU, Crime
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 13.09.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2018/ mw
MANGLEY @ KANCHA TAMANG
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
S. MURALIDHAR
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
