The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a three-month parole to establish social ties and care for minor children. The Court noted the petitioner had an unexpired sentence of less than six months and family responsibilities that were already being met, finding no ground to grant the parole.
No relief granted; prayer for parole dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State SI Moolchand, PS Okhla Industrial Area.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 21.05.2018
eldest and aged 27 years old. The eldest daughter of the petitioner is married and there are two other daughters aged 18 years and 14 years. Though wife of the petitioner has expired about four years back, however, the son of the petitioner and the two other daughters are residing at H.No. RZ-506, Gali No. 24, Tuglakabad Ext. New delhi and are able to look after the home.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 21, 2018 ‘yo’
W.P.(CRL) 1305/2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether parole should be granted to the petitioner who has less than six months unexpired sentence?
Whether the petitioner proving family hardship is sufficient grounds to grant parole given his unexpired sentence duration?
MOHD. HARUN
STATE OF NCT DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
