Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging IPC offences. The High Court of Delhi found no ground to grant bail and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
57# $~
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl. M.A. No.8170/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
BAIL APPLN. 985/2018
persons including one person namely Lala and started scuffling with her. 3. Complainant further alleges that the petitioner touched her private parts with bad intention and put his hands on her breast. She further alleged that though the matter was amicably settled later on, however, on 19th February, 2018 at 4.00 PM Lala and her son came to her, quarrelled with her and tore her clothes.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 21, 2018
‘vn’
page 2 of 2
BAIL APPLN. 985/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in FIR No.100/2018 alleging offences under Sections 323/354/506/34 IPC.
Rahul
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
