The court disposed of multiple criminal writ petitions as infructuous after the competent authority granted parole to petitioners (except one) under specific conditions, rendering the challenge unnecessary.
Writ petitions numbered 1240/2018, 1243/2018, 1245/2018, 1250/2018 and 1252/2018 disposed of as infructuous upon parole grant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
versus
m
Respondents THE STATE & ANR. Represented by: Ms. Pumima Malik, Advocate for Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Sanjeev, PS Tilak Marg. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P. for CBI. W.P.(CRL) 1245/20181245/2018 Petitioner NEERAJ KUMAR Represented by: Mr. Khalil A. Ansari and Mr. Arif Shakeel, Advocates. versus
Respondents THE STATE & ANR. Represented by: Ms. Pumima Malik, Advocate for Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Sanjeev, PS Tilak Marg. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P. for CBI. + W.P.(CRL) 1250/2018 Petitioner RAJESHBISHT Represented by: Mr. Khalil A. Ansari and Mr. Arif Shakeel, Advocates. versus
Respondents THE STATE & ANR. Represented by: Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with SI Sanjeev, PS Tilak Marg. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P. for CBI.
W.P.(CRL) 1239/2018,1240/2018,1243/2018,1245/2018,1250/2018 and 1252/2018 Page 2 of 3
.+
W.P.(CRL) 1252/2018
SKJAISWAL Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Khalil A. Ansari and Mr. Arif Shakeel, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE & ANR. . . ' Respondents Represented by: Ms.- Pumima Malik, Advocate ' ' for Mr. Avi Singh, Additional ' , Standing Counsel for State with ' . \ , SI Sanjeev, PS Tilak Marg. " . ' ' Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P. ' , forCBI. -
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER % 20.07.2018
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 20,2018
'vn'
W.P. (CRL) 1239/2018,1240/2018,1243/2018,1245/2018,1250/2018 and 1252/2018 Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether W.P.(CRL). petitions challenging parole conditions become infructuous upon grant of parole.
Chander Mohan Singh and other petitioners
The State
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
