Disposed
Salim Malik v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./246/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous after the court received a report that the appellant had been released following completion of the sentence. Counsel sought to withdraw the appeal but could not appear due to lack of contact.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of appeal and application as infructuous; return of trial court record.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
36# $~
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 246/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.3827/2017 (Delay)
¶4
| SALIM MALIK | ..... Appellant | |
|---|---|---|
| Represented by: versus |
Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Nigar Khan, Advocates (DHCLSC). |
|
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Represented by: | Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State | |
| with Inspector Veer Singh and | ||
| SI Vipin Kumar, PS Kotwali. |
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶6
O R D E R % 19.07.2018
¶7
- Report has been received from the Superintendent, Mandoli Jail stating that the appellant has been released after completion of the sentence and also the sentence in default of payment of fine.
¶8
- Learned counsel for the appellant on the last date sought leave to withdraw the appeal on instructions from the appellant as the appellant did not wish to pursue the appeal. Thus this Court directed the appellant to be present in Court today.
¶9
- Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is not in touch with him after he gave instructions to withdraw the appeal, thus he could not be present in Court today.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Salim Malik
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court